7 research outputs found

    Ensemble divide and conquer approach to solve the rating scores’ deviation in recommendation system

    Get PDF
    The rating matrix of a personalized recommendation system contains a high percentage of unknown rating scores which lowers the quality of the prediction. Besides, during data streaming into memory, some rating scores are misplaced from its appropriate cell in the rating matrix which also decrease the quality of the prediction. The singular value decomposition algorithm predicts the unknown rating scores based on the relation between the implicit feedback of both users and items, but exploiting neither the user similarity nor item similarity which leads to low accuracy predictions. There are several factorization methods used in improving the prediction performance of the collaborative filtering technique such as baseline, matrix factorization, neighbour-base. However, the prediction performance of the collaborative filtering using factorization methods is still low while baseline and neighbours-base have limitations in terms of over fitting. Therefore, this paper proposes Ensemble Divide and Conquer (EDC) approach for solving 2 main problems which are the data sparsity and the rating scores’ deviation (misplace). The EDC approach is founded by the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) algorithm which extracts the relationship between the latent feedback of users and the latent feedback of the items. Furthermore, this paper addresses the scale of rating scores as a sub problem which effect on the rank approximation among the users’ features. The latent feedback of the users and items are also SVD factors. The results using the EDC approach are more accurate than collaborative filtering and existing methods of matrix factorization namely SVD, baseline, matrix factorization and neighbours-base. This indicates the significance of the latent feedback of both users and items against the different factorization features in improving the prediction accuracy of the collaborative filtering technique

    Review of the temporal recommendation system with matrix factorization

    Get PDF
    The temporal recommendation system (TRS) is designed for providing users with an accurate prediction based on the history of their behaviour during a precise time. Most TRS approaches use matrix factorization and collaborative filtering, which are primarily based on the distribution of the user preferences. Recently, TRS has gained significant attention because it improves the accuracy of prediction. This is because since the temporal drift in the user preferences is observed, users' preferences within the short term and long term can be utilized to predict the best item to be recommended. Several existing review papers have focused on the general problems of the recommendation system (RS) and similarity measures, and they refer to recent improvements based on three recommendation strategies which are user rating, tagging and trust values. However, there is a lack of recent review papers of TRS with rating score strategy, especially in terms of learning factorization features of temporal terms. This paper fills this gap and highlights the issues and challenges for both general and temporal RS techniques. The prediction approaches based on collaborative filtering technique are reviewed depending on the behaviour of users and items. The challenges and approaches of temporal-based RS are discussed. This review includes the matrix factorization approaches that are integrated with such temporal factors as long-term preferences, short-term preferences, decay, and drift. The outcome of this review prioritizes guidance to focus on matrix factorization, temporal terms and drifting of users' preferences

    Temporal-based approach to solve item decay problem in recommendation system

    Get PDF
    The rating matrix of a recommendation system contains a high percentage of data sparsity which lowers the prediction accuracy of the collaborative filtering technique (CF). Recently, the temporal based factorization approaches have been used to solve the sparsity problem, but these approaches have a weakness in terms of learning the popularity decay of items during the long-term which lowers the prediction accuracy of the CF technique. The LongTemporalMF approach has been proposed to solve these problems. The x-means algorithm and the bacterial foraging optimization algorithm have been integrated within the LongTemporalMF approach to generate and optimize the genres weights which are integrated with the factorization features and the long-term preferences in terms of personality. The experimental results show that the LongTemporalMF approach has the accurate prediction performance compared to the benchmark approaches

    Bacterial foraging optmization algorithm for neural network learning enhancement

    Get PDF
    Backpropagation algorithm is used to solve many real world problems using the concept of Multilayer Perceptron. However, main disadvantages of Backpropagation are its convergence rate is relatively slow, and it is often trapped at the local minima. To solve this problem, in literatures, evolutionary algorithms such as Particle Swarm Optimization algorithm has been applied in feedforward neural network to optimize the learning process in terms of convergence rate and classification accuracy but this process needs longer training time. To provide alternative solution, in this study, Bacteria Foraging Optimization Algorithm has been selected and applied in feedforward neural network to enhance the learning process in terms of convergence rate and classification accuracy. One of the main processes in Bacteria Foraging Optimization algorithm is the chemotactic movement of a virtual bacterium that makes a trial solution of the optimization problem. This process of chemotactic movement is guided to make the learning process of Artificial Neural Network faster. The developed Bacteria Foraging Optimization Algorithm Feedforward Neural Network (BFOANN) is compared against Particle Swarm Optimization Feedforward Neural Network (PSONN). The results show that BFOANN gave better performance in terms of convergence rate and classification accuracy compared to PSONN

    Temporal integration based factorization to improve prediction accuracy of collaborative filtering

    Get PDF
    A recommender system provides users with personalized suggestions for items based on the user’s behaviour history. These systems often use the collaborative filtering (CF) for analysing the users’ preferences for items in the rating matrix. The rating matrix typically contains a high percentage of unknown rating scores which is called the data sparsity problem. The data sparsity problem has been solved by several approaches such as Bayesian probabilistic, machine learning, genetic algorithm, particle swarm optimization and matrix factorization. The matrix factorization approach through temporal approaches has the accurate performance in addressing the data sparsity problem but still with low accuracy. The existing temporal-based factorization approaches used the long-term preferences and the short-term preferences. The difference between long-term preferences is that it utilizes the whole recorded preferences while the short-term preferences utilizes the recorded preferences within a session (e.g. week, month, season, etc.). However, there are four issues when a factorization approach is adopted which are latent feedback learning, score overfitting, user’s interest drifting and item’s popularity decay over time. This study proposes three approaches which are (i) the Ensemble Divide and Conquer (EDC) which achieved accurate latent feedback learning, (ii) two personalized matrix factorization (MF) based temporal approaches, namely the LongTemporalMF and ShortTemporalMF to solve overfitting during the optimization process, user’s interest drifting and item’s popularity decays over time and (iii) TemporalMF++ approach which solved all the issues. The TemporalMF++ approach relies on the k-means algorithm and the bacterial foraging optimization algorithm. The Root Mean Squared Error metric is used to evaluate the prediction accuracy. The factorization approaches such as the Singular Value Decomposition, Baseline, Matrix Factorization and Neighbours based Baseline are used to be compared against the proposed approaches. In addition, the Temporal Dynamics, Short-Term based Latent, Short-Term based Baseline, Long-Term, and Temporal Interaction approaches are used to benchmark the proposed approaches. The MovieLens, Epinions, and Netflix Prize are real-world datasets which are used in the experimental settings. The experimental results show the TemporalMF++ approach is higher prediction accuracy compared to the approaches of EDC, LongTemporalMF, and ShortTemporalMF. In addition, the TemporalMF++ approach has a prediction accuracy higher than the benchmark approaches of factorization and temporal. In summary, the TemporalMF++ approach has a superior effectiveness in improving the accuracy prediction of the CF by learning the temporal behaviour

    Global variation in postoperative mortality and complications after cancer surgery: a multicentre, prospective cohort study in 82 countries

    No full text
    © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 licenseBackground: 80% of individuals with cancer will require a surgical procedure, yet little comparative data exist on early outcomes in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs). We compared postoperative outcomes in breast, colorectal, and gastric cancer surgery in hospitals worldwide, focusing on the effect of disease stage and complications on postoperative mortality. Methods: This was a multicentre, international prospective cohort study of consecutive adult patients undergoing surgery for primary breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer requiring a skin incision done under general or neuraxial anaesthesia. The primary outcome was death or major complication within 30 days of surgery. Multilevel logistic regression determined relationships within three-level nested models of patients within hospitals and countries. Hospital-level infrastructure effects were explored with three-way mediation analyses. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03471494. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and Jan 31, 2019, we enrolled 15 958 patients from 428 hospitals in 82 countries (high income 9106 patients, 31 countries; upper-middle income 2721 patients, 23 countries; or lower-middle income 4131 patients, 28 countries). Patients in LMICs presented with more advanced disease compared with patients in high-income countries. 30-day mortality was higher for gastric cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (adjusted odds ratio 3·72, 95% CI 1·70–8·16) and for colorectal cancer in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (4·59, 2·39–8·80) and upper-middle-income countries (2·06, 1·11–3·83). No difference in 30-day mortality was seen in breast cancer. The proportion of patients who died after a major complication was greatest in low-income or lower-middle-income countries (6·15, 3·26–11·59) and upper-middle-income countries (3·89, 2·08–7·29). Postoperative death after complications was partly explained by patient factors (60%) and partly by hospital or country (40%). The absence of consistently available postoperative care facilities was associated with seven to 10 more deaths per 100 major complications in LMICs. Cancer stage alone explained little of the early variation in mortality or postoperative complications. Interpretation: Higher levels of mortality after cancer surgery in LMICs was not fully explained by later presentation of disease. The capacity to rescue patients from surgical complications is a tangible opportunity for meaningful intervention. Early death after cancer surgery might be reduced by policies focusing on strengthening perioperative care systems to detect and intervene in common complications. Funding: National Institute for Health Research Global Health Research Unit

    Effects of hospital facilities on patient outcomes after cancer surgery: an international, prospective, observational study

    No full text
    © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 licenseBackground: Early death after cancer surgery is higher in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) compared with in high-income countries, yet the impact of facility characteristics on early postoperative outcomes is unknown. The aim of this study was to examine the association between hospital infrastructure, resource availability, and processes on early outcomes after cancer surgery worldwide. Methods: A multimethods analysis was performed as part of the GlobalSurg 3 study—a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study of patients who had surgery for breast, colorectal, or gastric cancer. The primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and 30-day major complication rates. Potentially beneficial hospital facilities were identified by variable selection to select those associated with 30-day mortality. Adjusted outcomes were determined using generalised estimating equations to account for patient characteristics and country-income group, with population stratification by hospital. Findings: Between April 1, 2018, and April 23, 2019, facility-level data were collected for 9685 patients across 238 hospitals in 66 countries (91 hospitals in 20 high-income countries; 57 hospitals in 19 upper-middle-income countries; and 90 hospitals in 27 low-income to lower-middle-income countries). The availability of five hospital facilities was inversely associated with mortality: ultrasound, CT scanner, critical care unit, opioid analgesia, and oncologist. After adjustment for case-mix and country income group, hospitals with three or fewer of these facilities (62 hospitals, 1294 patients) had higher mortality compared with those with four or five (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3·85 [95% CI 2·58–5·75]; p<0·0001), with excess mortality predominantly explained by a limited capacity to rescue following the development of major complications (63·0% vs 82·7%; OR 0·35 [0·23–0·53]; p<0·0001). Across LMICs, improvements in hospital facilities would prevent one to three deaths for every 100 patients undergoing surgery for cancer. Interpretation: Hospitals with higher levels of infrastructure and resources have better outcomes after cancer surgery, independent of country income. Without urgent strengthening of hospital infrastructure and resources, the reductions in cancer-associated mortality associated with improved access will not be realised. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research
    corecore